Re: Guess the number

Elite of the forum · July 15, 2014, 21:02:42 PM

2

Ronnietheblue · July 15, 2014, 21:01:50 PM

higher

DaveW · July 15, 2014, 21:03:34 PM

4

Elite of the forum · July 15, 2014, 21:05:55 PM

3

Ronnietheblue · July 15, 2014, 21:04:58 PM

Unlucky Dave. Correct Bob

DaveW · July 15, 2014, 21:07:10 PM

That is a bummer

Ronnietheblue · July 15, 2014, 21:07:44 PM

Well it is between the two numbers young Dave

DaveW · July 15, 2014, 21:11:03 PM

I thought that they were inclusive, should be worded as greater than and less than to be precise

Ronnietheblue · July 15, 2014, 21:11:04 PM

We'll bear that in mind oh wise one

DaveW · July 15, 2014, 21:13:14 PM

Thank you

Ronnietheblue · July 15, 2014, 21:12:59 PM

Youre welcome

Elite of the forum · July 16, 2014, 05:36:20 AM

greater than 77 lower than 777

Ronnietheblue · July 16, 2014, 05:58:15 AM

444 precisely

Elite of the forum · July 16, 2014, 19:42:33 PM

That would be higher

Ronnietheblue · July 16, 2014, 20:18:36 PM

589 exactly

DaveW · July 16, 2014, 20:50:11 PM

666

Ronnietheblue · July 16, 2014, 21:02:07 PM

601

Elite of the forum · July 16, 2014, 21:16:56 PM

And all those sensible guesses would be lower

Ronnietheblue · July 16, 2014, 21:50:40 PM

going to plump for 484 precisely

Elite of the forum · July 17, 2014, 06:55:25 AM

That also would be lower

A bakers dozen ?

Ronnietheblue · July 17, 2014, 07:37:30 AM

413

Elite of the forum · July 17, 2014, 08:07:21 AM

No no no

Higher

think again young Ronald

DaveW · July 17, 2014, 10:41:12 AM

471

Ronnietheblue · July 17, 2014, 11:16:54 AM

Dam

Elite of the forum · July 17, 2014, 17:58:43 PM

Our little cockenee friend is correct

DaveW · July 17, 2014, 18:00:07 PM

Higher than 2000 less than 2200

Ronnietheblue · July 17, 2014, 18:05:21 PM

2069

DaveW · July 17, 2014, 18:09:32 PM

higher

Ronnietheblue · July 17, 2014, 18:09:05 PM

2169

DaveW · July 17, 2014, 18:11:03 PM

lower